Jonathan Allen
-
Idea: Could automated conflict‑of‑interest screening reduce editor workload?
Research Idea
Editors spend time checking reviewer COI: same institution, recent co‑authorship, competing grants. Could an automated pre‑screening system flag these before invitations go out?
1 Comment-
Automation can catch obvious shared affiliations and co‑author links.
-
-
Idea: Could journal review reports become publicly available alongside publi...
Research Idea
There is ongoing debate about opening peer‑review reports to public view alongside accepted manuscripts. Open reviews increase transparency yet raise concerns over reviewer anonymity and additional workload. What would be the major pros and cons of such a system?
View more comments-
Public review reports would let readers understand how the paper evolved during revision.
3 -
Many reviewers would refuse to participate if their comments become fully public.
4 - View more comments
-
-
What are your personal rules for giving constructive reviews to papers you f...
Method Help
Reviewing a weak paper requires balancing honesty with professionalism. Harsh but unhelpful reviews help no one, while overly gentle ones waste the process. What tone and content do you aim for when reviewing a clearly weak manuscript?
View more comments-
Identify the specific fundamental flaws rather than attacking the authors’ competence.
2 -
Suggest concrete directions for improvement where possible.
2 - View more comments
-
