Daniel Lopez
-
When is it acceptable to perform additional new analyses during manuscript r...
Paper Discussion
During revision many authors run brand‑new analyses beyond what original submission contained. Some new analyses are reasonable responses to reviewer feedback, others expand manuscript scope substantially. Where should authors draw this boundary during rebuttal work?
Benjamin Hill, Anthony Anderson and 15 others4 CommentsView more comments-
New analyses directly answering explicit reviewer requests are fully appropriate.
2 -
Large brand‑new exploratory research outside reviewer questions should usually go to future papers.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Practical advice for creating fair comparison groups in observational study ...
Method Help
Biased comparison groups will invalidate observational research conclusions. Creating well‑matched comparison cohorts requires careful thought. What common pitfalls do you observe when researchers define comparison groups for observational analysis?
View more comments-
Clearly define inclusion and exclusion criteria for both target and comparison groups upfront.
4 -
Avoid post‑hoc tweaking group boundaries after seeing outcome results.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Step‑by‑step routine to self‑audit your manuscript before formal submission
Method Help
Self‑auditing your own paper is hard because you become blind to your own errors. Having a structured checklist‑driven workflow can catch many flaws before sending to journals. What items always appear in your pre‑submission self‑audit checklist?
View more comments-
Double‑check consistency of terminology across every section of the manuscript.
2 -
Verify that every citation inside text exists in your reference list.
2 - View more comments
-
-
The value of author response documents beyond just the rebuttal table
Paper Discussion
Many journals want both a point‑by‑point rebuttal and a general response summary. A clear narrative response can help reviewers see how your revisions address the overall direction of their feedback. How much care do you put into this broader response?
-
Insight: Growing demand for interdisciplinary research reviewers
More journals are seeking reviewers with cross‑domain knowledge. Interdisciplinary submissions bring new evaluation challenges for editorial boards.
View more comments-
Interdisciplinary work is hard to judge fairly.
2 -
Many good projects struggle to find suitable reviewers.
2 - View more comments
-
-
My experience of using UniResearch to improve paper reading efficiency
I’ve been using UniResearch for one month to process massive academic papers for my project. The intelligent abstract analysis and keyword extraction functions help me quickly screen high‑value literature. Does anyone have other practical usage tips for this academic platform?
-
The academic trend analysis feature is super helpful for grasping the latest research hotspots in my field.
1 -
I hope the platform can add a custom note synchronization function to record reading thoughts in real time.
1
-
