-
The value and limits of self‑citations in academic manuscripts
Paper Discussion
Self‑citations are necessary to connect your new work to your prior publications. But excessive self‑citation creates negative impressions for reviewers. Where do you draw your practical boundary for reasonable self‑citation usage?
-
When should you consider withdrawing your already‑submitted manuscript?
Paper Discussion
After submission, new results may emerge, or you discover serious flaws inside your work. Under what conditions is withdrawing a manuscript the responsible choice instead of waiting for review outcomes?
View more comments-
Withdraw promptly when you detect critical experimental errors that undermine core conclusions.
2 -
Minor typos do not justify manuscript withdrawal; fix them during revision phase.
- View more comments
-
-
Opinion: The rising importance of dataset papers in modern research
Paper Discussion
Dataset‑focused publications used to receive relatively little respect. Today high‑quality curated datasets can enable dozens of downstream studies. Should dataset papers receive equal prestige compared to algorithm‑focused papers?
View more comments-
Building high‑quality datasets requires massive rigorous work that deserves formal recognition.
2 -
But some dataset papers lack sufficient validation and quality control, which complicates evaluation.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Should you cite unpublished internal lab reports in your formal manuscript?
Paper Discussion
Internal lab reports contain useful preliminary data but never went through peer review. Some supervisors encourage citing them; other scholars argue they should stay out of public manuscripts. Where do you draw your personal boundary?
View more comments-
I only cite internal lab reports if the full data can be provided to reviewers upon request.
2 -
Journals vary widely in their acceptance of internal report citations.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Risks and downsides of over‑reliance on preprints for literature review
Paper Discussion
Preprints grant fast access to cutting‑edge research, yet they have not passed formal peer review. What pitfalls should researchers watch out for when building literature surveys heavily based on preprint resources?
View more comments-
Preprint conclusions may get heavily modified or even retracted after formal peer review.
2 -
Some preprints contain uncaught experimental flaws that would be filtered out in journal review.
2 - View more comments
-
-
When is it reasonable to request additional reviewer rounds after major revi...
Paper Discussion
Sometimes major revisions bring new findings that substantially change parts of your manuscript. Under which circumstances is it appropriate to ask editors for another full review cycle instead of just minor revision check?
View more comments-
Only request extra rounds when new results fundamentally alter core conclusions.
2 -
Editors dislike repeated revision loops caused by scope creep.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Should we cite conference abstracts in formal manuscripts?
Paper Discussion
Conference abstracts contain preliminary findings that have not gone through full peer review. Some researchers cite them while others believe they should be avoided entirely in journal papers. Where do you draw the line?
View more comments-
I only cite conference abstracts when there is no full‑text published alternative.
2 -
Reviewers sometimes push back against abstract‑only citations during revision.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Thoughts on the reproducibility crisis in modern research
Paper Discussion
Research reproducibility remains a widespread challenge in multiple disciplines. Complete parameter recording, open‑source data sharing and strict experimental control can help relieve this problem.
View more comments-
Many factors lead to poor reproducibility besides researcher error.
2 -
Journals should encourage raw data public submission.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Warning signs of predatory journals you should know
Paper Discussion
Many early‑career researchers fall for predatory journal invitations. Rapid‑acceptance promises, obscure editorial boards and abnormal submission fees are typical warning signals.
View more comments-
I receive dozens of suspicious journal emails every month.
4 -
Check journal indexing databases before submitting manuscripts.
4 - View more comments
-
-
Global trend: more open‑access journals strengthen article screening
Several well‑known open‑access journals have tightened peer‑review standards, responding to past criticisms of loose acceptance thresholds.
View more comments-
This change is really encouraging for the whole community.
2 -
Hope OA cost will not rise sharply alongside stricter checks.
2 - View more comments
-
- Load More
