• Arianna posted an update

      6 weeks ago (edited)

      Paper Discussion

      Discussion: Should supplementary materials receive equal attention in peer‑r...

      Paper Discussion

      Many important experiments, ablation data and proofs get moved into supplementary appendices. Yet reviewers often give supplementary material only superficial checks. Is this creating reproducibility risks for published papers?

      Eric Young, Edward Harris and 25 others
      3 Comments
      • Crucial validation experiments should stay inside main manuscript instead of being pushed to supplements.

        2
        • Editors should explicitly remind reviewers to seriously evaluate supplementary content.

          2
          • Readers frequently rely heavily on supplementary material when building upon published work.

            2