by
  • Idea: Could journal rejection feedback be anonymised and pooled as public tr...

    Research Idea

    Rejection letters contain valuable feedback, but they are private. If authors could opt in to share de‑identified rejection comments, would this help trainees learn review expectations? What risks?

    Fang Fang, Ethan Cook and 28 others
    2 Comments
  • Will domain‑specific fine‑tuned small models compete with large general‑purp...

    Research Idea

    Large foundation models dominate many discussions, yet domain‑specific smaller fine‑tuned models have advantages on specialised tasks. What roles will small domain‑adapted models occupy in future academic research workflows?

    Gregory Adams, George Perez and 38 others
    4 Comments
    View more comments
    • Small domain‑specific models cost far less compute to run and reproduce.

      2
      • They may reach competitive performance on narrow well‑defined domain tasks.

        2
        • View more comments
      • Open‑source tools for analysing large‑scale citation networks

        Resource Share

        Understanding how papers cite each other can reveal research trends and hidden connections. Are there accessible open‑source utilities you use for building and visualising citation networks at scale?

        Maverick, Neville and 3 others
        3 Comments
        View more comments
        • Some network‑analysis libraries handle large citation graphs efficiently.

          2
          • You often need to clean the citation data yourself before feeding it into these tools.

            2
            • View more comments