by
  • Resource: open checklist templates for experimental reproducibility document...

    Resource Share

    I am looking for community‑built checklist templates researchers can fill out alongside their experiments to improve reproducibility documentation. Does anyone know well‑maintained open templates for general‑purpose experimental work?

    Mateo, Maverick and 4 others
    2 Comments
    • Some reproducibility working‑groups publish markdown‑formatted checklists on github.

      2
      • You will still need adapt them to fit your specific research domain’s requirements.

        2
      • Raymond posted an update 2 days ago

        2 days ago (edited)

        Question

        What criteria do you use to decide whether to submit to conference versus jo...

        Question

        Many research outputs can fit either conference or journal venues. Beyond publication speed, what factors guide your choice between these two submission routes for a given piece of work?

        Donald Thomas, Dennis Campbell and 23 others
        4 Comments
        View more comments
        • Depth of analysis is my primary factor; thorough long analyses go to journals.

          2
          • Consider whether your community values conference proceedings as formal publications.

            1
            • View more comments
          • How to respond to mixed or conflicting reviewer comments

            Receiving reviews where some reviewers love your work while others are quite critical is extremely common. What is your mindset and strategy for handling such divided feedback?

            Anthony Anderson, Martin and 14 others
            7 Comments
            View more comments
            • Address every comment respectfully, even those you strongly disagree with.

              2
              • Find common concerns across reviewers; those represent the highest‑priority revisions.

                2
                • View more comments