Juan Ma
-
Thoughts on the challenges of evaluating interdisciplinary grant proposals
Research Idea
Reviewing interdisciplinary grant applications creates unique evaluation challenges. Reviewers may lack full domain expertise across all involved fields. How can funding‑panel processes be improved to fairly assess interdisciplinary project proposals?
Dylan Rogers, Donald Thomas and 24 others4 CommentsView more comments-
Assemble mixed‑discipline review panels with complementary domain knowledge.
2 -
Provide reviewers special guidance about judging cross‑disciplinary work.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Will AI‑assisted peer‑review tools reshape reviewer workload in the next 5 y...
Research Idea
Multiple AI‑auxiliary review tools keep emerging. They can spot missing references, check consistency and flag methodological weaknesses. What realistic changes do you expect for peer‑review workflows over the coming years?
View more comments-
AI will take over tedious mechanical checking parts of reviewing work.
2 -
High‑level scientific judgement will still remain fully human responsibility.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Ethical risks of using generative AI for research data processing
Generative AI can process experimental data quickly, yet researchers must prevent AI‑fabricated data. All AI‑processed steps should be transparently recorded in manuscripts.
View more comments-
Transparent documentation should become standard requirement.
2 -
Some students don’t realize AI may invent fake data points.
2 - View more comments
-
