Hong Feng
-
Discussion: Should supplementary information be peer reviewed with the same ...
Paper Discussion
Some reviewers barely look at supplements; others treat them as equally important. Should journals require the same depth of review for appendices and supplementary figures?
Jian Jia, Jerry Mitchell and 54 others4 CommentsView more comments-
Supplements that support core conclusions deserve careful scrutiny.
2 -
Exploratory extra material is lower priority for deep review.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Thoughts on the value of short technical notes alongside full research papers
Research Idea
Short technical notes focus on method quirks, tool descriptions or small but useful observations, without large full‑scale studies. Are short technical‑note publications sufficiently valued within modern academic evaluation systems?
View more comments-
Technical notes can disseminate practical knowledge that full papers ignore.
2 -
Unfortunately many evaluation systems heavily prioritise full original‑research manuscripts.
2 - View more comments
-
-
How do you manage the workload when you are assigned several unrelated side ...
Question
Researchers often juggle a main project alongside several smaller unrelated side tasks. Switching between unrelated work can reduce focus and efficiency. What strategies help you handle multiple parallel projects without losing quality?
View more comments-
Batch similar tasks together to reduce expensive context switching.
2 -
Set explicit priorities so urgent side tasks do not always crowd out core work.
2 - View more comments
-
-
How do you decide whether an emerging research topic is worth entering early?
Question
Jumping into an emerging research area early can bring big opportunities, but also high uncertainty about its staying power. What signals do you look for when deciding whether to invest in a newly trending topic?
View more comments-
Check whether the underlying problem has real lasting importance, not just recent hype.
2 -
See if strong groups are investing serious effort rather than only casual interest.
2 - View more comments
-
-
Common mistakes when writing your rebuttal letter for journal revisions
Method Help
Rebuttal letters are easy to get wrong even when you fix all technical issues. Bad structure, defensive tone or missing cross‑references can hurt your chances of acceptance. What frequent mistakes do you observe in rebuttal writing?
View more comments-
Never start arguing before you clearly acknowledge each reviewer point.
2 -
Use explicit markers so reviewers can locate your manuscript changes quickly.
2 - View more comments
-
