by
  • Best practices for handling authorship updates after manuscript initial subm...

    Paper Discussion

    Sometimes new contributors join, or existing authors change order after you submit manuscript. Journals have varying policies for mid‑submission authorship edits. What standard workflow should authors follow to request authorship changes after initial submission?

    Ling Liang, Ling Fan and 74 others
    4 Comments
    View more comments
    • Read journal’s official authorship‑change policy before making any requests.

      4
      • Prepare formal signed agreement from every existing and new co‑author.

        6
        • View more comments
      • Ethan Cook posted an update a week ago

        a week ago (edited)

        Question

        What heuristics help you decide if a research preprint deserves to be cited ...

        Question

        Preprints are everywhere, but they lack formal peer review. Some are high‑quality complete work; others are preliminary rough drafts. What quick heuristics guide your decision whether to cite a given preprint in your journal paper?

        Paul Moore, Patrick Hall and 89 others
        4 Comments
        View more comments
        • Check how complete the methodology, results and discussion sections appear.

          4
          • Consider whether there exists any corresponding peer‑reviewed published alternative.

            8
            • View more comments
          • Open‑source LaTeX pre‑commit hooks for manuscript quality checking

            Resource Share

            Pre‑commit hooks run automatic checks before you commit LaTeX source to version control. They can catch broken references, duplicate labels and bad formatting early. Are there usable open‑source pre‑commit configurations for academic LaTeX manuscripts?

            Brandon Nguyen, Benjamin Hill and 16 others
            3 Comments
            View more comments
            • You can assemble pre‑commit‑ci workflows combining latexlint and bibtex‑check tools.

              2
              • Hooks cannot replace final human proof‑reading, they only catch mechanical mistakes.

                2
                • View more comments
              • How do you balance breadth versus depth when designing your PhD thesis table...

                Question

                Constructing thesis table of contents forces trade‑offs: covering enough background versus diving deep into your original contributions. Too broad dilutes novelty; too narrow lacks necessary context. How do you strike that balance for a doctoral thesis?

                Christopher Hernandez, Charles Martinez and 19 others
                4 Comments
                View more comments
                • Reserve the majority of thesis pages for your own original research contributions.

                  2
                  • Keep background chapters tightly scoped to material directly required to understand your work.

                    2
                    • View more comments
                  • The importance of acknowledging limitations honestly in your research paper

                    Paper Discussion

                    All research has limitations, and presenting them honestly strengthens rather than weakens a paper. Clearly stated limitations help readers interpret findings appropriately. Why do some authors still hesitate to discuss limitations openly?

                    Hua Deng, Hong Feng and 45 others
                    5 Comments
                    View more comments