by
  • The value of author response documents beyond just the rebuttal table

    Paper Discussion

    Many journals want both a point‑by‑point rebuttal and a general response summary. A clear narrative response can help reviewers see how your revisions address the overall direction of their feedback. How much care do you put into this broader response?

    Jack Rivera, Hui Lin and 48 others
    4 Comments
    View more comments
    • The narrative response helps reviewers see the overall logic of your revision.

      2
      • Group related comments together to show you understood their bigger concerns.

        2
        • View more comments
      • Tips for surviving the paper revision cycle

        Just wrapped up a major round of journal revisions. One lesson learned: address every single reviewer comment explicitly, even when you disagree. Polite, evidence‑backed rebuttals work far better than defensive responses. What’s your best revision advice for early‑career researchers?

        Henry Collins, Murphy and 26 others
        3 Comments
        View more comments
        • Yes, never ignore minor reviewer remarks. Even if you think it’s trivial, acknowledge it and make corresponding adjustments or explain your reasoning clearly.

          2
          • It’s also smart to reorganize manuscript structure during revision, don’t only patch individual sentences.

            1
            • View more comments