<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Zhiqiang Peng | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zhiqiangpeng/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zhiqiangpeng/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Zhiqiang Peng's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d6483d592abd9acf9ae18c91a9bbbb4</guid>
				<title>Christopher Hernandez posted an update: Overfitting is a common headache for novice [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/500/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:48 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overfitting is a common headache for novice researchers, especially when experimental data is limited. Complex models easily memorize noise instead of capturing valid data patterns. I’m curious about your practical and effective regularization strategies for small dataset scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5aa1e9205e4b0f53bef58d2bb7bb5cae</guid>
				<title>Mark Taylor posted an update: Data collection is the foundation of all empirical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/455/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data collection is the foundation of all empirical and computational research. However, many researchers waste months on invalid data screening, low‑quality data cleaning and inconsistent data standards. What efficient data collection and filtering workflows do you adopt to accelerate your research progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78c7cf05ef009730b43eb5a8be9e59e7</guid>
				<title>Xiulan Jiang posted an update: Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/454/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle of academic research, but many published papers have unrepeatable experimental results due to incomplete parameter records and hidden operation details. How can we strictly guarantee research reproducibility in daily experiments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da3342af7c65722822cbc774d1933caa</guid>
				<title>Chao Guo posted an update: I’ve been testing out UniResearch for aggregating and [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/418/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:59 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been testing out UniResearch for aggregating and synthesizing large paper sets lately. Being able to quickly cross‑compare findings across dozens of related works cuts down my reading time significantly. Curious who else has tried similar AI‑augmented research workflows. What pain points are you still hoping these tools can solve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c04435bd7b15e3088c5b13411155cc07</guid>
				<title>Min Lu posted an update: My team is running large batches of ablation [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/413/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:34 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My team is running large batches of ablation studies. Keeping track of hyper‑parameter variants, seed values and environment settings is getting messy. What workflows or conventions does your lab follow to avoid reproducibility disasters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		