<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Yulan Yu | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yulanyu/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yulanyu/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Yulan Yu's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">967f0a8215b416a469383bcf3e3d21d4</guid>
				<title>Hai Yuan posted an update: Academic Trend Discussion

Open science has become [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/508/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:00:59 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Academic Trend Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Open science has become a mainstream trend, enabling free access to papers, datasets and experimental codes. However, it also brings issues like data misuse and premature idea leakage. What’s your authentic experience and thoughts on practicing open science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f680e55d5f047e0b58810633cfb2b786</guid>
				<title>William Garcia posted an update: Nowadays, most innovative research achievements come [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/501/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 06:00:52 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowadays, most innovative research achievements come from interdisciplinary fields. Yet cross‑disciplinary study requires more time to accumulate knowledge across different domains and faces higher publication difficulty. Would you recommend new researchers to try interdisciplinary projects?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5aa1e9205e4b0f53bef58d2bb7bb5cae</guid>
				<title>Mark Taylor posted an update: Data collection is the foundation of all empirical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/455/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data collection is the foundation of all empirical and computational research. However, many researchers waste months on invalid data screening, low‑quality data cleaning and inconsistent data standards. What efficient data collection and filtering workflows do you adopt to accelerate your research progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78c7cf05ef009730b43eb5a8be9e59e7</guid>
				<title>Xiulan Jiang posted an update: Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/454/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle of academic research, but many published papers have unrepeatable experimental results due to incomplete parameter records and hidden operation details. How can we strictly guarantee research reproducibility in daily experiments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89de7626b9d3087a42a7af1a5c2d736b</guid>
				<title>Zhen Xie posted an update: Reading top conference papers, model metrics keep [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/415/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:42 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading top conference papers, model metrics keep climbing. But when moving these models toward real‑world inference, latency, cost and robustness often become show‑stoppers. Do you think conference evaluation frameworks should put more weight on deployment‑oriented metrics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		