<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Wen Ren | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wenren/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wenren/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Wen Ren.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dbaf9ea4bf87f99c461a8a0e1ba24065</guid>
				<title>Wen Ren posted an update: Research Idea
Many research projects are heavily [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/946/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:25:34 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Many research projects are heavily oriented toward leaderboard metrics. But leaderboard performance does not always translate to real‑world robustness. What negative side‑effects have you observed from leaderboard‑driven research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">83ca44afb486addfac867c961793cbab</guid>
				<title>Wen Ren posted an update: Open‑access publishing brings wider visibility, yet [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/791/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 02:37:36 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open‑access publishing brings wider visibility, yet article processing charges create financial burdens for researchers without sufficient grants. More institutional funding support is under discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">55743583538e2b17939dc3b9ea677e23</guid>
				<title>Wen Ren posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/572/#acomment-585</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:31:52 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Address every comment respectfully, even those you strongly disagree with.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/raymondgreen/" data-bb-hp-profile="296" rel="nofollow">Raymond</a> posted an update Receiving reviews where some reviewers love your work while others are quite critical is extremely common. What is your mindset and strategy for handling such divided feedback?					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		