<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Scott Torres | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/scotttorres/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/scotttorres/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Scott Torres.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6b55a9ae9e69c9eb3b5795e7f3bc634c</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1045/#acomment-1064</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:27:49 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always report effect size alongside significance metrics.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/waltermurphy/" data-bb-hp-profile="313" rel="nofollow">Murphy</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>It is tempting to draw strong conclusions from borderline‑significant experimental outcomes. Over‑interpretation of weak statistics remains a pervasive problem across many [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c9fd53d5a59f1639c31b513ac541f29</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/787/#acomment-802</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 07:10:37 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never include references inside your abstract section.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/tping/" data-bb-hp-profile="13" rel="nofollow">Tping</a> posted an update Abstracts are the first part read by reviewers and readers. Common errors include vague descriptions, over‑long sentences and inconsistent tense usage across disciplines.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">94da20d3380c589e9822265c0159d536</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/516/#acomment-521</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:09:10 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reserve a special section to summarize unresolved research gaps, which is the core value of a review paper.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zhenxie/" data-bb-hp-profile="339" rel="nofollow">Zhen Xie</a> posted an update A qualified literature review is not just a simple summary of existing papers. It requires systematic sorting, comparative analysis and research gap summarization. How do you [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		