<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Scott Torres | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/scotttorres/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/scotttorres/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Scott Torres.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:15:26 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f1dd38b6740ba03cc9b4f2bdf83a9a51</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2262/#acomment-2272</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:08:03 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Include a top‑level README with environment and dependency versions.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/andrewmartin/" data-bb-hp-profile="275" rel="nofollow">Martin</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Code is often shared but poorly documented, making reproduction impossible. What is your minimal standard for code you deposit with your manuscript?</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">acf06a628cd9e05a9c4bb14c6c5ba15e</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2075/#acomment-2099</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 03:49:00 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviewers should adjust evaluation expectations accordingly for flagged submissions.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/minchen/" data-bb-hp-profile="321" rel="nofollow">Min Chen</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Occasionally researchers submit conference abstracts built purely around planned future work, with zero real preliminary data yet collected. Some people argue [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">721f1ac4f67dfcb443adfee9ec23db37</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted an update: Question
Reviewers receive manuscripts of very [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2010/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:49:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Reviewers receive manuscripts of very different lengths. Long survey papers demand substantially more reading effort. How do you judge whether you have enough available bandwidth before accepting a long survey‑manuscript review invitation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f932ac5e67575329a8f6347b5077f635</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted an update: Collaboration
Co‑authors can hold very different [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1908/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 13:45:10 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Co‑authors can hold very different preferences for target journals: some prioritise prestige, others care about review speed or open‑access policy. Disagreement on submission venue can stall manuscript progress. What is your way to reach consensus on journal selection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4672437c61f8bd18f7128a1e249b595e</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1846/#acomment-1866</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:26:18 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minimal working prototype can sometimes be sufficient instead of fully‑polished software.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/stephenking/" data-bb-hp-profile="289" rel="nofollow">Stephen King</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Many computational papers come with associated open‑source tools, yet building and maintaining software adds large extra workload. Under which circumstances is it [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6df81a610121623c665d3f118e125bc3</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1788/#acomment-1811</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 09:47:20 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pair new students with an experienced peer buddy for day‑to‑day technical questions.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yulanyu/" data-bb-hp-profile="355" rel="nofollow">Yulan Yu</a> posted an update <p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>New master students joining existing collaborative projects face large knowledge gaps about prior work, codebases and data conventions. Good onboarding reduces [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">66af8bbba7b420f43ab593ec4f1cc24d</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1302/#acomment-1339</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:07:45 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time and project management skills are rarely taught but constantly needed.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/christopherhernandez/" data-bb-hp-profile="267" rel="nofollow">Christopher Hernandez</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Beyond technical ability and writing, researchers rely on a range of softer skills for long‑term success. Some skills are clearly underappreciated in graduate [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6b55a9ae9e69c9eb3b5795e7f3bc634c</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1045/#acomment-1064</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:27:49 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always report effect size alongside significance metrics.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/waltermurphy/" data-bb-hp-profile="313" rel="nofollow">Murphy</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>It is tempting to draw strong conclusions from borderline‑significant experimental outcomes. Over‑interpretation of weak statistics remains a pervasive problem across many [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c9fd53d5a59f1639c31b513ac541f29</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/787/#acomment-802</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 07:10:37 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never include references inside your abstract section.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/tping/" data-bb-hp-profile="13" rel="nofollow">Tping</a> posted an update Abstracts are the first part read by reviewers and readers. Common errors include vague descriptions, over‑long sentences and inconsistent tense usage across disciplines.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">94da20d3380c589e9822265c0159d536</guid>
				<title>Scott Torres posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/516/#acomment-521</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:09:10 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reserve a special section to summarize unresolved research gaps, which is the core value of a review paper.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zhenxie/" data-bb-hp-profile="339" rel="nofollow">Zhen Xie</a> posted an update A qualified literature review is not just a simple summary of existing papers. It requires systematic sorting, comparative analysis and research gap summarization. How do you [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		