<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Qiang Huang | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/qianghuang/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/qianghuang/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Qiang Huang's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a52c2f2bc964772362ec73a637846b90</guid>
				<title>Madelyn posted an update: Method Help
Many researchers only organise data after [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/961/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:25:56 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Many researchers only organise data after paper acceptance. Poor archival practice creates reproducibility risks. What is your step‑by‑step routine to archive raw and intermediate data while the project is ongoing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">196fbdcfe1be301b18acd7c4f9956fa3</guid>
				<title>Adam Evans posted an update: Resource Share
Clean metadata is critical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/942/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:10:31 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Clean metadata is critical for reproducibility, yet manually organising metadata is extremely time‑consuming. Are there lesser‑known lightweight open utilities you rely on for dataset metadata standardisation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1469c0ac79abed03929fc2e8aa17e04b</guid>
				<title>Feng Song posted an update: Research Experience Sharing

Digital or physical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/807/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:48:31 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Research Experience Sharing</strong></p>
<p>Digital or physical lab notebooks are your core research asset. Record raw data, parameter settings and unexpected anomalies in real‑time instead of recalling information days later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a521082502b839c422c7c966de210155</guid>
				<title>Ping Lu posted an update: Finding good public datasets for method validation takes [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/608/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:43:34 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding good public datasets for method validation takes a lot of digging. What are your go‑to high‑quality open datasets for general‑purpose method benchmarking in your field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49a6a3064e9c06329715d9916fc85b20</guid>
				<title>Benjamin Hill posted an update: Academic Question &#38; Discussion

Many researchers fall [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/496/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 04:01:06 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Academic Question &amp; Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Many researchers fall into a dilemma: pursuing rigorous experimental research will delay publication, while rushing papers may lead to insufficient research depth. How do you balance research quality and publication efficiency in daily academic work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8f30271179285138c560492ab7611cf4</guid>
				<title>Robert Johnson posted an update: The abstract is the first impression of a paper [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/495/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 02:17:03 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The abstract is the first impression of a paper and determines reviewers’ initial judgment. I’ve summarized many common errors, such as redundant background introduction and unclear research contributions. What abstract mistakes do you often see in submitted papers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5aa1e9205e4b0f53bef58d2bb7bb5cae</guid>
				<title>Mark Taylor posted an update: Data collection is the foundation of all empirical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/455/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data collection is the foundation of all empirical and computational research. However, many researchers waste months on invalid data screening, low‑quality data cleaning and inconsistent data standards. What efficient data collection and filtering workflows do you adopt to accelerate your research progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78c7cf05ef009730b43eb5a8be9e59e7</guid>
				<title>Xiulan Jiang posted an update: Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/454/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle of academic research, but many published papers have unrepeatable experimental results due to incomplete parameter records and hidden operation details. How can we strictly guarantee research reproducibility in daily experiments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a46deb669f399681d24efa4665ee6bb</guid>
				<title>Nathan Phillips posted an update: I’ve noticed many early‑stage researchers spend weeks [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/409/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:17 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve noticed many early‑stage researchers spend weeks picking suitable benchmarks. Some public datasets contain hidden distribution bias that can mislead model performance conclusions. What’s your go‑to checklist before locking down your benchmark suite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		