<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Ping Zheng | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/pingzheng/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/pingzheng/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Ping Zheng.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">01f73032a4bb5727e48462f241a41fea</guid>
				<title>Ping Zheng posted an update: Method Help
Citation bias means certain papers [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1019/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 11:13:49 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Citation bias means certain papers get over‑cited while equally valuable works get overlooked. What practical steps can you take to reduce citation bias when you build your literature survey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3c6801c2f4a76369ea64ab7d8e542255</guid>
				<title>Ping Zheng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/904/#acomment-913</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:26:33 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journals should encourage raw data public submission.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wutian/" data-bb-hp-profile="349" rel="nofollow">Wu Tian</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Research reproducibility remains a widespread challenge in multiple disciplines. Complete parameter recording, open‑source data sharing and strict experimental control [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8c0cd6ad1b3788eee4b76d2e00d56f13</guid>
				<title>Ping Zheng posted an update: A qualified literature review is not merely listing [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/844/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 07:10:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A qualified literature review is not merely listing papers by publication time. You need to classify viewpoints, find contradictions and identify unresolved research gaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2d7f10431c9d84503c669573a67af56b</guid>
				<title>Ping Zheng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/690/#acomment-708</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:43:39 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try time‑blocking and force myself to stop working on weekends.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fangfang/" data-bb-hp-profile="376" rel="nofollow">Fang Fang</a> posted an update Many researchers struggle with mental fatigue during long‑cycle projects. Small daily habits, reasonable task splitting and regular rest are vital to sustain research output. What [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		