<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Peter Stewart | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/peterstewart/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/peterstewart/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Peter Stewart's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 21:11:32 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d66d5011998562bb03d93390aa915d39</guid>
				<title>Joseph Davis posted an update: Question
You cite a preprint during revision, then [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2298/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 12:31:42 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>You cite a preprint during revision, then the preprint is withdrawn or drastically rewritten. How should you update citations and explain the change to editors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2348486de0bf7cea27619b3d502c3956</guid>
				<title>Charles Martinez posted an update: Paper Discussion
Sometimes you have internal lab [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2287/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 08:27:08 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes you have internal lab reports, internal validation runs or whitepapers that are not public preprints. Are these appropriate citations in manuscripts, and how should they be formatted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f246515aecbf2f07bd857249fb519ec</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted an update: Paper Discussion
Reviewers often underestimate how long [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2255/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 03:49:50 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Reviewers often underestimate how long a high‑quality review takes. If journals stated an estimated time commitment upfront, would this improve acceptance rates and review quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">52974cb526881fc38fe4feae376c3dac</guid>
				<title>John Smith posted an update: Collaboration
Program officers monitor grant [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2207/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:30:21 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Program officers monitor grant project progress. Sometimes their implicit expectations about speed or deliverables diverge from real‑world research realities. What communication habits help you align expectations with your funding program officer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">abb9d0f66ad2fe1c21ce5dade0677966</guid>
				<title>Jun Dong posted an update: Collaboration
Manuscript writing collaboration can [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2031/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:28:39 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Manuscript writing collaboration can get blocked if one co‑author keeps postponing their writing tasks. Continuous delay threatens planned submission timeline. What practical steps can lead author take to resolve this blocking situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">110f39c4964847640f538547c15d99df</guid>
				<title>Charles Martinez posted an update: Paper Discussion
Subgroup analysis is frequently used [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1690/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 07:11:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Subgroup analysis is frequently used to explore heterogeneous experimental effects. Without careful handling it brings multiple risks including multiple‑comparison bias and small‑sample instability. What mistakes do you observe in published subgroup‑analysis work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1d54c8c81fb8bcd5732656805f9236ff</guid>
				<title>Zhiqiang Peng posted an update: Resource Share
Finding clean, simple academic [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1011/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:30:01 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Finding clean, simple academic slide templates takes extra work. Could everyone share links to open‑source slide decks they reuse for conference presentations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a52c2f2bc964772362ec73a637846b90</guid>
				<title>Madelyn posted an update: Method Help
Many researchers only organise data after [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/961/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:25:56 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Many researchers only organise data after paper acceptance. Poor archival practice creates reproducibility risks. What is your step‑by‑step routine to archive raw and intermediate data while the project is ongoing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">196fbdcfe1be301b18acd7c4f9956fa3</guid>
				<title>Adam Evans posted an update: Resource Share
Clean metadata is critical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/942/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 07:10:31 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Clean metadata is critical for reproducibility, yet manually organising metadata is extremely time‑consuming. Are there lesser‑known lightweight open utilities you rely on for dataset metadata standardisation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65e6da42411a76ed6656a74ac675027f</guid>
				<title>Min Pan posted an update: Full‑text reading for every paper is impossible when [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/832/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 01:13:15 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full‑text reading for every paper is impossible when writing a thesis. Learn to skim abstracts, conclusions and key figures first, then dive into full‑text for high‑relevance resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1469c0ac79abed03929fc2e8aa17e04b</guid>
				<title>Feng Song posted an update: Research Experience Sharing

Digital or physical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/807/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 09:48:31 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Research Experience Sharing</strong></p>
<p>Digital or physical lab notebooks are your core research asset. Record raw data, parameter settings and unexpected anomalies in real‑time instead of recalling information days later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6079058bbcf8e677d4d1d5a8b6faa31f</guid>
				<title>Edwards posted an update: Every researcher faces paper rejection. It can [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/658/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:14:32 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every researcher faces paper rejection. It can shake confidence and stall your project momentum. What is your practical process to recover and move forward after receiving rejection notices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a521082502b839c422c7c966de210155</guid>
				<title>Ping Lu posted an update: Finding good public datasets for method validation takes [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/608/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:43:34 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding good public datasets for method validation takes a lot of digging. What are your go‑to high‑quality open datasets for general‑purpose method benchmarking in your field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5aa1e9205e4b0f53bef58d2bb7bb5cae</guid>
				<title>Mark Taylor posted an update: Data collection is the foundation of all empirical [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/455/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data collection is the foundation of all empirical and computational research. However, many researchers waste months on invalid data screening, low‑quality data cleaning and inconsistent data standards. What efficient data collection and filtering workflows do you adopt to accelerate your research progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78c7cf05ef009730b43eb5a8be9e59e7</guid>
				<title>Xiulan Jiang posted an update: Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/454/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:22:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experimental reproducibility is the basic principle of academic research, but many published papers have unrepeatable experimental results due to incomplete parameter records and hidden operation details. How can we strictly guarantee research reproducibility in daily experiments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da3342af7c65722822cbc774d1933caa</guid>
				<title>Chao Guo posted an update: I’ve been testing out UniResearch for aggregating and [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/418/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:59 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been testing out UniResearch for aggregating and synthesizing large paper sets lately. Being able to quickly cross‑compare findings across dozens of related works cuts down my reading time significantly. Curious who else has tried similar AI‑augmented research workflows. What pain points are you still hoping these tools can solve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89de7626b9d3087a42a7af1a5c2d736b</guid>
				<title>Zhen Xie posted an update: Reading top conference papers, model metrics keep [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/415/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:18:42 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading top conference papers, model metrics keep climbing. But when moving these models toward real‑world inference, latency, cost and robustness often become show‑stoppers. Do you think conference evaluation frameworks should put more weight on deployment‑oriented metrics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		