<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Hua Liao | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/hualiao/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/hualiao/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hua Liao.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:15:26 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5ff5c41c6de5080080e3985e64924063</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2134/#acomment-2149</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:11:47 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not dump every single secondary exploratory run just because you computed it.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-maverick/" data-bb-hp-profile="11" rel="nofollow">Maverick</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Supplementary appendices can easily grow uncontrolled. Researchers keep adding extra analyses which are tangential to core claims. Bloated supplements make them hard [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87296ce93029cdc7bbd9168a2661411a</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1942/#acomment-1960</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 02:38:18 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check whether key hyper‑parameters, environment and dataset versions are fully documented.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/pinglu/" data-bb-hp-profile="368" rel="nofollow">Ping Lu</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>When you act as reviewer for computational papers, verifying reproducibility is important but time‑consuming. Without running full code locally you still can assess [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cd5ae88b653fec76c6ea7832942c40cc</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1801/#acomment-1835</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 01:18:19 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch for distribution shifts between embedding training data and your target dataset.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jamesjones/" data-bb-hp-profile="261" rel="nofollow">James Jones</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Many researchers directly download public pre‑computed embeddings for their analysis work. This saves compute time but can bring hidden pitfalls such as embedding [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">777371e2ab0944fafece4362d73b4cf5</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1792/#acomment-1816</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:10:30 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flag partial‑completion responses and decide inclusion rules explicitly.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/brandonnguyen/" data-bb-hp-profile="293" rel="nofollow">Brandon Nguyen</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Raw survey datasets frequently contain incomplete replies, duplicate entries, careless outlier responses and inconsistent answer formatting. What structured [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f3d4aa8f95cae64dacaca72e957cbd5</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1698/#acomment-1719</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 13:47:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cite your prior relevant publications even when you are rewriting your own content.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/denniscampbell/" data-bb-hp-profile="302" rel="nofollow">Dennis Campbell</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Text reuse, including self‑plagiarism risks, is a confusing topic for many researchers. Different journals have different policies on re‑using your own prior writing. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">866b5782ec1ff2c31efa1e565f579db7</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1657/#acomment-1675</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 13:49:52 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preprint repositories are one good outlet for useful short technical observations.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/hongfeng/" data-bb-hp-profile="343" rel="nofollow">Hong Feng</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Short technical notes focus on method quirks, tool descriptions or small but useful observations, without large full‑scale studies. Are short technical‑note [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4781b14461d2b168ad40b54f13469649</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1437/#acomment-1450</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 02:37:51 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move non‑essential but relevant details to supplementary material where appropriate.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/alexanderbaker/" data-bb-hp-profile="299" rel="nofollow">Alexander Baker</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Methodology sections need enough detail for reproducibility without becoming bloated. Different journals have different conventions. How do you gauge the right level [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1e287d877c312e60d3231b8e697afeb8</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1283/#acomment-1316</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 02:01:16 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeding any random elements guarantees identical figure output across runs.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zhenjin/" data-bb-hp-profile="370" rel="nofollow">Zhen Jin</a> posted an update <p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Reproducible figures mean the same raw data always produce the same visual output. This requires scripted, deterministic rendering pipelines. Which open tooling do you [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">12eeda27c5de349ed458102fab098c69</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/946/#acomment-964</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:26:23 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teams may tweak hyperparameters endlessly just to squeeze tiny metric gains.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wenren/" data-bb-hp-profile="361" rel="nofollow">Wen Ren</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Many research projects are heavily oriented toward leaderboard metrics. But leaderboard performance does not always translate to real‑world robustness. What negative [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ea84b0fa0ad3fa60b6169748a3a2ce7</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/904/#acomment-916</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:44:17 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproducibility training should be added to graduate courses.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wutian/" data-bb-hp-profile="349" rel="nofollow">Wu Tian</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Research reproducibility remains a widespread challenge in multiple disciplines. Complete parameter recording, open‑source data sharing and strict experimental control [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c165f30eb17c0491c4aea78476e2413c</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/627/#acomment-639</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:47:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many hiring and funding bodies still over‑simplify evaluation using raw citation numbers.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/paulmoore/" data-bb-hp-profile="273" rel="nofollow">Paul Moore</a> posted an update Citation counts are widely used to evaluate research output. Yet high‑citation papers are not always the most rigorous, and solid niche work may get very few citations. How should we [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		