<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Hua Liao | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/hualiao/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/hualiao/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hua Liao.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">12eeda27c5de349ed458102fab098c69</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/946/#acomment-964</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 12:26:23 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teams may tweak hyperparameters endlessly just to squeeze tiny metric gains.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wenren/" data-bb-hp-profile="361" rel="nofollow">Wen Ren</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Many research projects are heavily oriented toward leaderboard metrics. But leaderboard performance does not always translate to real‑world robustness. What negative [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ea84b0fa0ad3fa60b6169748a3a2ce7</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/904/#acomment-916</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:44:17 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproducibility training should be added to graduate courses.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wutian/" data-bb-hp-profile="349" rel="nofollow">Wu Tian</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Research reproducibility remains a widespread challenge in multiple disciplines. Complete parameter recording, open‑source data sharing and strict experimental control [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c165f30eb17c0491c4aea78476e2413c</guid>
				<title>Hua Liao posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/627/#acomment-639</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:47:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many hiring and funding bodies still over‑simplify evaluation using raw citation numbers.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/paulmoore/" data-bb-hp-profile="273" rel="nofollow">Paul Moore</a> posted an update Citation counts are widely used to evaluate research output. Yet high‑citation papers are not always the most rigorous, and solid niche work may get very few citations. How should we [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		