<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Hua Deng | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/huadeng/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/huadeng/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hua Deng.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:01:12 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de1b4f5e54d0f9b2a804fbcf456f5819</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1987/#acomment-2007</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:41:54 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever possible, prefer to wait for journal‑published derivative work if available.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/chaoguo/" data-bb-hp-profile="332" rel="nofollow">Chao Guo</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Dissertations contain large amounts of valuable unpublished work. But they have not gone through formal peer review. Some journals discourage citing PhD theses. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e22241975fe5742c69404b2e36feb99</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1950/#acomment-1965</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 03:48:09 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the list of confirmed invited speakers and past accepted paper titles.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-margaret/" data-bb-hp-profile="8" rel="nofollow">Margaret</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Many conference CfPs look similar on surface, but some are very focused while others accept extremely broad submissions. Submitting to mis‑aligned conferences wastes your [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">df40fa79fe825eb8dcb80a42c2999980</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1806/#acomment-1831</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:45:53 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers may overlook important details buried deep inside appendices.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jeffreyclark/" data-bb-hp-profile="282" rel="nofollow">Jeffrey Clark</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Several journals encourage shorter‑format submissions. Short articles enable faster dissemination, yet they also force authors to compress methodology, ablation and [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">429136b840a8f9a6b236e22f7728cff7</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1728/#acomment-1742</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:43:15 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will not count as formal peer‑reviewed publication output for your CV.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/donaldthomas/" data-bb-hp-profile="271" rel="nofollow">Donald Thomas</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Many conferences accept short abstract‑only submissions for work‑in‑progress presentations. These abstracts do not produce full proceedings publications. What [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">249c81460da692ba13b101e6b76363cf</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted an update: Research Idea
Rebuttal letters vary widely in [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1678/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 01:13:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Rebuttal letters vary widely in organisation quality. Pre‑built structured response templates might help junior authors write clearer rebuttals. What benefits and downsides would widespread template usage bring for peer‑review rebuttals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0766c069fbfb86bcd25791629d4cda0</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted an update: Collaboration
Large labs produce many papers [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1322/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 02:27:04 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Large labs produce many papers with overlapping contributions. Without a clear authorship policy, disputes and resentment can emerge. What authorship rules do large research groups find effective and fair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f96bcfbb589cb5bf038c908a24bac757</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1121/#acomment-1136</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 11:15:00 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crucial validation experiments should stay inside main manuscript instead of being pushed to supplements.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-arianna/" data-bb-hp-profile="2" rel="nofollow">Arianna</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Many important experiments, ablation data and proofs get moved into supplementary appendices. Yet reviewers often give supplementary material only superficial checks. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7b4d504153640f1aba8364601a840b99</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/976/#acomment-996</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:15:21 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always double‑check whether a preprint later received a revised journal‑published version.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yanxu/" data-bb-hp-profile="327" rel="nofollow">Yan Xu</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Preprints grant fast access to cutting‑edge research, yet they have not passed formal peer review. What pitfalls should researchers watch out for when building literature [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bab79aadef2b4ab8cefa70d4e14434d9</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/852/#acomment-872</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:49:16 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Log every modified variable so you won’t repeat mistakes.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yanxu/" data-bb-hp-profile="327" rel="nofollow">Yan Xu</a> posted an update Repeated experiment failures are normal for most researchers. Systematically record variable adjustments, do root‑cause analysis and avoid emotional self‑blame during low‑output phases.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1134a8c673962db9b2bf93ce8c430a25</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/748/#acomment-758</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 12:25:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Custom saved filter templates would be awesome.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/stephenking/" data-bb-hp-profile="289" rel="nofollow">Stephen King</a> posted an update <p><strong>Platform Related</strong></p>
<p>Many users don’t know UniResearch supports custom preprint filtering. You can set time windows, source repositories and research fields to track the latest [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd2236546b7423b1a53323483c876d45</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/658/#acomment-682</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 13:47:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not rewrite the whole paper immediately; step away for a few days first.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zacharyedwards/" data-bb-hp-profile="310" rel="nofollow">Edwards</a> posted an update Every researcher faces paper rejection. It can shake confidence and stall your project momentum. What is your practical process to recover and move forward after receiving rejection notices?					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2935ee7f94b2a33bf018b861b1896b6</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/608/#acomment-621</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:41:25 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep several different datasets in your benchmark suite, avoid drawing conclusions from one single source.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/pinglu/" data-bb-hp-profile="368" rel="nofollow">Ping Lu</a> posted an update Finding good public datasets for method validation takes a lot of digging. What are your go‑to high‑quality open datasets for general‑purpose method benchmarking in your field?					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ad6172a8463338444bbc86d821dd006c</guid>
				<title>Hua Deng posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/523/#acomment-532</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 03:49:21 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still keep short physical scratch notes for quick brainstorming and raw observation jottings.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/marktaylor/" data-bb-hp-profile="272" rel="nofollow">Mark Taylor</a> posted an update Physical lab notebooks are traditional, yet digital note systems offer search, version control and cloud backup. I’m debating fully switching over. What are pros and cons you have [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		