<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Hai Cui | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/haicui/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/haicui/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hai Cui.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">67806371dd3616b3be3d4591b70c6d10</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1073/#acomment-1099</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some journals are still hostile toward open‑review content.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jackrivera/" data-bb-hp-profile="301" rel="nofollow">Jack Rivera</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>Several experimental open peer‑review platforms exist, where reviews are publicly visible and anyone can contribute comments. What barriers prevent these systems from [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">acb15e7aec6b5376cb39c55ccced8d62</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1045/#acomment-1062</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:27:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre‑register your analysis plan whenever possible before you look at experimental outputs.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/waltermurphy/" data-bb-hp-profile="313" rel="nofollow">Murphy</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>It is tempting to draw strong conclusions from borderline‑significant experimental outcomes. Over‑interpretation of weak statistics remains a pervasive problem across many [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1458686dfe776a10ac39fbf99d8d591b</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1035/#acomment-1051</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:16:34 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mandate short written progress summaries shared to the whole group every two weeks.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jundong/" data-bb-hp-profile="350" rel="nofollow">Jun Dong</a> posted an update <p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Large multi‑party collaborations often have remote subgroups working semi‑independently. Without careful coordination, subgroups drift apart and produce incompatible [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1231bdb796d6158142d8ac45d40ada5</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1023/#acomment-1046</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 03:47:28 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prefer converting internal reports into preprints if you want to formally reference them publicly.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/xiufangdu/" data-bb-hp-profile="357" rel="nofollow">Xiufang Du</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Internal lab reports contain useful preliminary data but never went through peer review. Some supervisors encourage citing them; other scholars argue they should [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">444a797535db26ebaeae39f4143e6705</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/883/#acomment-903</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:30:44 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark completed milestones to maintain personal motivation.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jundong/" data-bb-hp-profile="350" rel="nofollow">Jun Dong</a> posted an update Vague large‑scale goals easily cause procrastination. Split big research objectives into measurable, time‑bound small milestones, and adjust flexibly when facing unexpected obstacles.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4e541db31d91b3714121106f209b6a05</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted an update: A recent academic community survey shows over 62% of [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/694/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 03:47:42 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent academic community survey shows over 62% of young researchers now use AI to assist initial literature screening. Most users remind everyone to double‑check all AI‑generated summaries manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79e175625dcaf82d691faba15cf10b65</guid>
				<title>Hai Cui posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/658/#acomment-687</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 01:12:15 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the reviewer comments carefully, sometimes rejection points you toward a better target venue.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zacharyedwards/" data-bb-hp-profile="310" rel="nofollow">Edwards</a> posted an update Every researcher faces paper rejection. It can shake confidence and stall your project momentum. What is your practical process to recover and move forward after receiving rejection notices?					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		