<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Frank Nelson | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/franknelson/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/franknelson/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Frank Nelson.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f1ba743ab8fb12f9e71b068de021da10</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1007/#acomment-1022</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 11:14:14 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ablate one variable at a time whenever feasible.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/xiuhuawei/" data-bb-hp-profile="359" rel="nofollow">Xiuhua Wei</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Poorly‑designed ablation studies waste computing resources and deliver limited insight. Many new researchers struggle to decide which components should be ablated. What [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fbe73873cc7d3baec41cb06f2a1a986b</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted an update: Resource Share
Few users notice you can [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/995/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:15:12 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Few users notice you can apply multi‑condition filters then export matched paper metadata as structured CSV. This enables offline statistical analysis of topic trends outside the platform web interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">68957c4a3048b0b993c8491aaa2c3db3</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted an update: Question
After your paper gets accepted or rejected, is [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/984/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:29:35 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>After your paper gets accepted or rejected, is it acceptable to contact reviewers for further discussion of their comments? Are there situations you should definitely avoid doing this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a91a519398409980ae602b43bdd4762e</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/736/#acomment-747</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 07:10:06 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clear warning labels sound like a practical solution.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/waltermurphy/" data-bb-hp-profile="313" rel="nofollow">Murphy</a> posted an update <strong>Academic Hot Topic</strong>

Preprint sharing accelerates academic exchange, but incomplete work may cause misunderstanding. Some scholars suggest adding obvious warning labels for [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8acc61a7ff4fec0f6f2db04b27225ed3</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/604/#acomment-624</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 01:11:55 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Document decisions in shared notes, so no one relies only on memory from video calls.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/leizhao/" data-bb-hp-profile="324" rel="nofollow">Lei Zhao</a> posted an update More research happens across institutes and time‑zones. Remote collaboration brings flexibility yet creates communication friction. What habits make remote academic partnerships work smoothly?					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">10e03b9d23684f3022ef6615c0798d8e</guid>
				<title>Frank Nelson posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/409/#acomment-457</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:24:49 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also helps to run a simple baseline first. If your vanilla baseline performs weirdly, your benchmark might be the culprit, not your model.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/nathanphillips/" data-bb-hp-profile="307" rel="nofollow">Nathan Phillips</a> posted an update I’ve noticed many early‑stage researchers spend weeks picking suitable benchmarks. Some public datasets contain hidden distribution bias that can mislead model performance [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		