<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Feng Cai | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fengcai/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fengcai/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Feng Cai.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:15:26 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf971fd59bf0d4d4f3205a3d91594ec3</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1932/#acomment-1952</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:49:45 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combine parsed results with cross‑reference lookup against public academic APIs when possible.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jianjia/" data-bb-hp-profile="373" rel="nofollow">Jian Jia</a> posted an update <p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes you only have local PDF files without accessible DOI metadata. Parsing metadata directly from PDF text can save manual typing work. What open command‑line [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4dc4b5e890de30c4294e31d7632e3347</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1928/#acomment-1945</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 12:31:38 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even minimal runnable code is far better than no code release at all.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/yulanyu/" data-bb-hp-profile="355" rel="nofollow">Yulan Yu</a> posted an update <p><strong>Research Idea</strong></p>
<p>More journals encourage or mandate code release upon publication. Open‑source code improves reproducibility, yet maintaining public code brings extra labour and support [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f87238fb79e8fa9a1df396768a097dc5</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Method Help
Manuscripts can accumulate redundant [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1757/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 13:44:06 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Manuscripts can accumulate redundant paragraphs across multiple rounds of revision. Repeated arguments bloat text and tire reviewers. What practical workflow helps you spot and eliminate redundant writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">798df8b532a402833b44a2d0e93c8139</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1589/#acomment-1610</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:49:06 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Periodically review and revoke access for members who leave the research group.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/nali/" data-bb-hp-profile="319" rel="nofollow">Na Li</a> posted an update <p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Many lab datasets cannot be fully open‑shared due to privacy or licensing constraints. Researchers need secure internal sharing workflows with granular access control. What [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">08a850e2dd737e1ea62acee3e5a910e1</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1582/#acomment-1600</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 03:47:27 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most cited papers come exclusively from one small set of research groups.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/jianjia/" data-bb-hp-profile="373" rel="nofollow">Jian Jia</a> posted an update <p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>A good literature review maintains fair coverage of different viewpoints. Unbalanced reviews over‑emphasise certain schools while down‑playing competing arguments. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a550ffa1b23744f3f73469606a0ab4ea</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1400/#acomment-1417</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 03:45:07 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weigh the value of early feedback against the risk of idea exposure.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zacharyedwards/" data-bb-hp-profile="310" rel="nofollow">Edwards</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Sharing preliminary results early can attract feedback and collaboration, but also risks premature exposure or scooping. Deciding the right timing to go public is [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">97c0bb5ac15cd108109cd3cb8baecfd2</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1386/#acomment-1409</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 01:16:17 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality of matches depends heavily on how well you describe your own interests.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-madelyn/" data-bb-hp-profile="5" rel="nofollow">Madelyn</a> posted an update <p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Finding research partners outside your immediate network can be difficult. Interest‑based platforms let researchers connect around shared topics. What open platforms have [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfc5ebebea8cabc5aedf83a54bca30d0</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1190/#acomment-1207</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:13:16 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new survey only makes sense if it covers new material or a meaningfully different angle.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-luna/" data-bb-hp-profile="7" rel="nofollow">Luna</a> posted an update <p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>The number of survey papers in a field can grow quickly. Writing yet another survey may add little value, but it can also bring fresh perspectives or update older reviews. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">174f4f8226c36aa4bb3f91b8222533ce</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Method Help
A well‑written README dramatically improves [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1158/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:30:58 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>A well‑written README dramatically improves the usability of open research software and datasets. Yet many researchers write vague README files. What concrete sections do you always include when writing README documentation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fae327a64072bc200c44adce0e340bfb</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Collaboration
Authorship‑order disagreements are a [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1065/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:33:55 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Authorship‑order disagreements are a frequent source of conflict in joint research projects. What practical early‑stage practices can lower the chance of later‑time authorship disputes among collaborators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0964446d0fa9942a05fabe5eaef9d41d</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1007/#acomment-1024</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:27:01 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoid combinatorial explosion of too many simultaneous changed factors.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/xiuhuawei/" data-bb-hp-profile="359" rel="nofollow">Xiuhua Wei</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Poorly‑designed ablation studies waste computing resources and deliver limited insight. Many new researchers struggle to decide which components should be ablated. What [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b3135db988d5730814aaa3b16418c76</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Question
Logical loopholes can sneak into manuscripts [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/934/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 02:39:57 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Logical loopholes can sneak into manuscripts even after multiple self‑reads. Many reviewers point out inconsistent assumptions or disconnected argument chains. What practical small checks do you run before submission to catch these logical gaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">92306b80a45c6590f7a1efbeee3a60a5</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/702/#acomment-733</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 01:12:04 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funding bodies should also value negative findings.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-mateo/" data-bb-hp-profile="9" rel="nofollow">Mateo</a> posted an update Lots of valid negative data gets discarded. These results can prevent other researchers from repeating the same failed attempts and deserve more exposure.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		