<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Feng Cai | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fengcai/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fengcai/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Feng Cai.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fae327a64072bc200c44adce0e340bfb</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Collaboration
Authorship‑order disagreements are a [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1065/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:33:55 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Authorship‑order disagreements are a frequent source of conflict in joint research projects. What practical early‑stage practices can lower the chance of later‑time authorship disputes among collaborators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0964446d0fa9942a05fabe5eaef9d41d</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1007/#acomment-1024</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:27:01 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avoid combinatorial explosion of too many simultaneous changed factors.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/xiuhuawei/" data-bb-hp-profile="359" rel="nofollow">Xiuhua Wei</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Poorly‑designed ablation studies waste computing resources and deliver limited insight. Many new researchers struggle to decide which components should be ablated. What [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b3135db988d5730814aaa3b16418c76</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted an update: Question
Logical loopholes can sneak into manuscripts [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/934/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 02:39:57 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Question</strong></p>
<p>Logical loopholes can sneak into manuscripts even after multiple self‑reads. Many reviewers point out inconsistent assumptions or disconnected argument chains. What practical small checks do you run before submission to catch these logical gaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">92306b80a45c6590f7a1efbeee3a60a5</guid>
				<title>Feng Cai posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/702/#acomment-733</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 01:12:04 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funding bodies should also value negative findings.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-mateo/" data-bb-hp-profile="9" rel="nofollow">Mateo</a> posted an update Lots of valid negative data gets discarded. These results can prevent other researchers from repeating the same failed attempts and deserve more exposure.					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		