<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>UniResearch Community | Eric Young | Activity</title>
	<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/ericyoung/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/ericyoung/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Eric Young.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 14:15:26 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b188520e6fe385034fd776ce17768b78</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/2321/#acomment-2333</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 03:49:57 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Include explicit tags: unchanged /revised text /supplementary addition.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/wuyao/" data-bb-hp-profile="362" rel="nofollow">Wu Yao</a> posted an update <p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Response letters can get messy without structure. Are there reusable markdown or LaTeX templates that separate reviewer comment, author response and manuscript change location clearly?</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fed805539e0e1630132a7b6bd9f50133</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted an update: Paper Discussion
Many manuscripts only cite supportive [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1898/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 11:10:45 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Paper Discussion</strong></p>
<p>Many manuscripts only cite supportive prior work while glossing over papers reporting opposite findings. Ignoring contradictory literature can weaken the persuasiveness of your argument. How thoroughly should you engage with conflicting published results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f99d959ce70243c5a2348614453b099</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1873/#acomment-1885</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 03:48:43 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Include negative or counter‑evidence codes explicitly within your coding scheme.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/guohuazeng/" data-bb-hp-profile="347" rel="nofollow">Guohua Zeng</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Manual qualitative coding is subjective by nature. Confirmation bias can make coders notice evidence supporting prior hypotheses while ignoring contradictory signals. [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a9c34a51be7299be3c920c6931f744eb</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1322/#acomment-1361</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:08:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resolve disputes through an agreed internal process rather than ad‑hoc negotiation.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/huadeng/" data-bb-hp-profile="344" rel="nofollow">Hua Deng</a> posted an update <p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Large labs produce many papers with overlapping contributions. Without a clear authorship policy, disputes and resentment can emerge. What authorship rules do large [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">890f281ecff4ea8b3fe2b410735d866d</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1249/#acomment-1272</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:23:06 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read relevant background literature quickly before forming strong judgements.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/bb-luna/" data-bb-hp-profile="7" rel="nofollow">Luna</a> posted an update <p><strong>Method Help</strong></p>
<p>Reviewers sometimes receive manuscripts outside their core specialisation. Reviewing such papers requires extra care to avoid unfair or shallow assessments. How do you [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">51f14e37849aee1bd8ca0c626ebe886e</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1208/#acomment-1229</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:56:33 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality of shared protocols varies, so check them against the original literature yourself.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/benjaminhill/" data-bb-hp-profile="294" rel="nofollow">Benjamin Hill</a> posted an update <p><strong>Resource Share</strong></p>
<p>Reproducibility improves when researchers share detailed experimental protocols. Are there well‑maintained open repositories where people publish standardised [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9af34a48f10b9d1ecc1e79b1fae32e1a</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/1065/#acomment-1086</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:24:05 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discuss tentative authorship contributions and order before major data generation begins.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/fengcai/" data-bb-hp-profile="353" rel="nofollow">Feng Cai</a> posted an update <p><strong>Collaboration</strong></p>
<p>Authorship‑order disagreements are a frequent source of conflict in joint research projects. What practical early‑stage practices can lower the chance of later‑time [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">63b56276fdc1eac8082b756f8f9b649b</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/795/#acomment-813</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:10:38 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many beginners skip deep literature gap analysis.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/zacharyedwards/" data-bb-hp-profile="310" rel="nofollow">Edwards</a> posted an update Common proposal rejection causes include unclear research gaps, unfocused research questions and unrealistic implementation plans. Spend enough time polishing your research background [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f296727c1931cd04187cff1437d77e82</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/766/#acomment-773</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:17:17 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many posters I saw were just compressed papers.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/johnsmith/" data-bb-hp-profile="257" rel="nofollow">John Smith</a> posted an update <strong>Conference &amp; Academic Exchange</strong>

A good poster needs concise logic, readable visuals and clear core conclusions. Avoid stuffing excessive text; reserve space for communication [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aea2a74e70ebfe902c8626986023d692</guid>
				<title>Eric Young posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://community.uniresearch.ai/news-feed/p/757/#acomment-764</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 01:11:52 +0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative or conflicting results deserve more publication chances.</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://community.uniresearch.ai/members/marktaylor/" data-bb-hp-profile="272" rel="nofollow">Mark Taylor</a> posted an update <strong>Research Experience Sharing</strong>

It is frustrating when your data conflicts with published conclusions. Before doubting your own setup, double‑check experiment parameters, sample [&hellip;]					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		