Resource Share

Many journals have long checklists: file formats, figure resolution, reference style, ethics statements. Are there open scripts or tools that can auto‑scan […]

Many groups run internal pre‑review rounds before sending manuscripts out. It helps catch flaws early and reduces review cycle waste. What does your lightweight internal peer review workflow look like?

Collaboration

Long multi‑year projects can face situations where an important collaborator has to step‑down due to career change, personal reasons or relocation. What practical […]

Method Help

Project risk registers list potential risks, likelihood, impact and planned mitigation actions. They are often required for large grant proposals. Many researchers […]

Resource Share

Many researchers switch reference manager software during their career. Moving large libraries with hundreds of entries manually is painful. Are there reliable open‑source […]

Supervisors and journal reviewers can occasionally request contradictory changes to the same manuscript. Following both is often impossible, and choosing one risks offending the other party. How do you resolve such conflicts?

Reviewers sometimes receive manuscripts outside their core specialisation. Reviewing such papers requires extra care to avoid unfair or shallow assessments. How do you responsibly review work that is only partially inside your expertise?

The number of survey papers in a field can grow quickly. Writing yet another survey may add little value, but it can also bring fresh perspectives or update older reviews. What factors should you weigh before starting a new survey paper?

Question

New preprints and papers appear every single day. Constantly reading every fresh publication can fragment your focus and slow your own project progress. What personal […]

Question

After your paper gets accepted or rejected, is it acceptable to contact reviewers for further discussion of their comments? Are there situations you should definitely avoid doing this?